Disconnected Financial Runtime
Intelligence and value.Beyond connectivity.
TAMVEL is building runtime infrastructure that lets financial applications keep permitted intelligence and bounded value flows working when the cloud is out of reach — and reconcile when it returns.
Network Offline
Runtime Local execution
Illustration: a network of connections fades away while the TAMVEL runtime at its centre keeps executing local work, then reconnects and reconciles.
Narrated overview · 2 minutes
Meet TAMVEL
A short, narrated walk through the runtime — with captions, a full transcript, and pause, mute and replay controls. Nothing plays until you press play.
Captions and transcript available. Download captions (WebVTT).
01The problem
Connectivity is a condition, not a guarantee.
01 — Connected
With a network, the cloud does the work.
Risk models, assistants and payment authorization all sit a request away. When connectivity is good, that is the right design — and TAMVEL keeps it.
02 — Degrading
Then the connection thins.
Transit tunnels, rural corridors, crowded venues, regional outages, captive portals. Latency climbs, requests retry, and the experience starts to hesitate.
03 — Offline
Most financial experiences simply stop.
Cloud-dependent intelligence goes silent and payment flows cannot authorize. The user is left with an error instead of a decision — even for actions that could have been handled safely on the device.
04 — With TAMVEL
The runtime keeps permitted work going.
Policies set by the application and its financial partners decide what may continue locally: on-device inference, bounded value operations and queued intents. Nothing else is attempted. Everything is reconciled when connectivity returns.
- Risk checkCloud
- PaymentAuthorized
- AssistantCloud model
With a network, the cloud does the work.
Risk models, assistants and payment authorization all sit a request away. When connectivity is good, that is the right design — and TAMVEL keeps it.
02The TAMVEL Runtime
One runtime. Every condition.
Select any component to inspect it.
03Offline AI
Intelligence that doesn’t wait for a signal.
Placement
Local
Runs on the device first. If the local model’s confidence falls below the application’s threshold, the runtime escalates to the cloud.
Deciding factors
- Keeps sensitive data on the device+2.7
- No network round-trip+1.9
- No marginal cloud cost+0.5
04Green, cost-aware execution
The right place to run — including later.
Local
Selectedscore 2.4
Edge
reserved · not in V1
Cloud
score -1.1
Defer
score -0.6
Why local
- Keeps sensitive data on the device+1.2
- No network round-trip+1.0
- No marginal cloud cost+0.5
A simplified teaching model of how placement decisions trade off. The production policy engine is in development; its inputs, weights and measurements will be published with methodology before any efficiency or emissions claims are made.
05Offline value
Bounded value, honestly reconciled.
Offline allowance (illustrative)
200.00 / 200.00
secure value module
secure value module
Signed records
No offline records yet.
What this is
- Software infrastructure for compatible wallets and financial applications.
- Bounded, pre-authorized value with limits set by the application’s financial partners.
- Signed records with replay controls, reconciled against authoritative systems.
What this is not
- Not a consumer wallet, and TAMVEL does not intend to issue a stablecoin.
- Not offline blockchain consensus, and not unlimited offline finality.
- Not risk-free: conflicting or excess offline claims can occur on a compromised device; partner liability and recipient provisional exposure are bounded, and conflicts are surfaced during reconciliation.
How TAMVEL bounds double-spend
A compromised payer device can sign more than it is allowed to spend, and we do not claim otherwise. What TAMVEL bounds is where that overspend can land.
| Party | Bound |
|---|---|
| Financial partner | Never pays beyond the hold it placed when it issued the allowance. Reconciliation accepts at most the allowance amount, in the order claims arrive; the rest are refused. |
| Payer | Debited at most the allowance amount, however many payments the device signed. |
| Recipient | Can be left with a provisional record that is later refused. Each recipient device is capped by the partner’s per-payment and total provisional limits, and provisional value is never spendable. |
| TAMVEL | Holds no funds and never signs or sends a transfer. |
Conflicting signatures from one device are kept as evidence for the partner’s risk process, and a partner can choose to freeze a key that provably signed two conflicting payments. This is sandbox research on a test network. The full exposure model, with a test for each bound, is available to prospective pilot partners on request.
06Security
Designed to fail closed, not open.
Hardware-backed keys
Signing keys for value operations are designed to live in the device’s hardware-backed keystore or secure element where available, and are never exported.
Bounded exposure
Partner liability is capped at the held allowance, while policy limits cap the provisional exposure a recipient may accept. Conflicting or excess claims are resolved during reconciliation.
Replay protection
Every signed record is designed to carry a monotonic counter and binding to its parties, so replayed records can be rejected and counter reuse or conflicting offline activity can be detected during reconciliation.
Tamper resistance
Offline-value capability is enabled only after required device and hardware-backed key checks are verified while online. During an outage, the runtime relies on provisioned credentials and local consistency checks, and fails closed when required state is invalid.
Auditability
Decisions and value operations produce structured, signed logs that partners can inspect — including why intelligence ran where it ran.
Reconciliation
Offline activity is provisional until settled against authoritative systems. Conflicts are surfaced to the partner’s risk process, never silently resolved.
Least privilege
Each module gets only the capabilities it needs. The intelligence layer cannot authorize payments; the value module cannot read model inputs.
- Principles, not certifications
TAMVEL holds no security certifications today. Independent assessments will be published as they are completed. Report a vulnerability.
07Developers
Android first. Policy as code.
App.kt
// PROTOTYPE API — illustrative only. Names and shapes will change.val runtime = Tamvel.initialize(context) { policy = Policy.fromAsset("tamvel-policy.json") connectivity = ConnectivityMonitor.system() telemetry = Telemetry.localOnly()}08Who it is for
Built for the teams that move money.
- 01WalletsKeep core flows usable on trains, in basements and across patchy regions.
- 02FintechsAdd on-device intelligence without routing every decision through the cloud.
- 03NeobanksDegrade gracefully instead of failing hard when the network does.
- 04Remittance platformsServe corridors where connectivity is intermittent by default.
- 05Payment companiesExplore bounded offline acceptance with explicit reconciliation.
- 06BanksEvaluate resilient, policy-governed execution for customer channels.
- 07Stablecoin infrastructure providersResearch how bounded, pre-authorized value can survive short outages.
09Pilot
Build it with us.
We are inviting a small number of design partners — wallets, fintechs, banks and payment and stablecoin infrastructure teams — to shape the runtime before general availability.
- 01
Scope
A short conversation about the flows you need to keep working offline, and the constraints of your partners.
- 02
Design
We map policies — what may run locally, what must wait, what is never allowed — against your architecture.
- 03
Prototype
Early SDK access for a bounded evaluation in a non-production environment.
Participation is exploratory and non-binding. TAMVEL is an early-stage company; the pilot does not involve moving real customer funds.
10Founder

Rohit Kashyap
Founder, TAMVEL · Founder & CEO, Zyaku
Rohit Kashyap founded TAMVEL to keep financial apps working when the network doesn’t. He is also the founder and CEO of Zyaku, an offline-first platform for creators and independent journalists. Across both companies, his focus is technology that keeps working for people when the internet doesn’t.